Article 81: Union Safeguard Procedure

Summary of Article 81

  • Commission’s Role in Evaluating National Measures: The Commission evaluates objections or concerns raised by Member States regarding national measures on AI systems and decides whether the measures are justified, ensuring coordination among market surveillance authorities.
  • States’ Duties After Commission Decisions: Member States must enforce appropriate restrictive measures for AI systems deemed non-compliant by the Commission or withdraw unjustified national measures as instructed by the Commission.
  • Addressing Shortcomings in Standards: If non-compliance stems from deficiencies in harmonised standards or specifications, the Commission initiates procedures to address these shortcomings under Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.

Commission’s Role in Evaluating National Measures

1. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 79(5), or within 30 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, objections are raised by the market surveillance authority of a Member State to a measure taken by another market surveillance authority, or where the Commission considers the measure to be contrary to Union law, the Commission shall without undue delay enter into consultation with the market surveillance authority of the relevant Member State and the operator or operators, and shall evaluate the national measure. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall, within six months, or within 60 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, starting from the notification referred to in Article 79(5), decide whether the national measure is justified and shall notify its decision to the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned. The Commission shall also inform all other market surveillance authorities of its decision.

States’ Duties After Commission Decisions

2. Where the Commission considers the measure taken by the relevant Member State to be justified, all Member States shall ensure that they take appropriate restrictive measures in respect of the AI system concerned, such as requiring the withdrawal of the AI system from their market without undue delay, and shall inform the Commission accordingly. Where the Commission considers the national measure to be unjustified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure and shall inform the Commission accordingly.

Addressing Shortcomings in Standards

3. Where the national measure is considered justified and the non-compliance of the AI system is attributed to shortcomings in the harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in Articles 40 and 41 of this Regulation, the Commission shall apply the procedure provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.

All you need to know about the EU AI Act
in one Cheat Sheet

Get Free PDF Now
About the author
Philip Mohr

Philip Mohr

Philip Mohr, a certified AIGP, is an AI governance consultant with over a decade of expertise in product management, data governance and privacy, leading initiatives at Addtrust (addtrust.com).

#1 Resource on EU AI ACT Compliance

Sign up to get access to free resources and checklists

#1 Resource on EU AI ACT Compliance

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to #1 Resource on EU AI ACT Compliance.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.